l E daily newsletter Zenit is a fairly accurate sample of what there is. And what does not. You're always hoping you'll check out some good news, but what is puzzling is newsletters. As this yesterday:
The Court of the Gentiles discusses the God of the atheists
The title could serve as an example of oxymoron. And misleading. The content of the atrium, is sensed, then dark. But with a lantern. The
light shade light illuminates from the word of the rector, Ivano Dionigi dottore . I'm not clear if declared / atheist recognizes solid-solid or if it is, rather, a deliquescent agnostic. Anyway, what they say they said would have delighted in the Blessed-sudden JPII º:
"I think that talking about the man is equivalent to around talking about God, and speak of God means above all to speak of man. "
said this should be sung followed ite missa est or the Bolognese version of our castizo forget it. And that was that. But as it seems that there were 1500 expectant souls. O bodies, depending how you look, according to whether or not a believer or not the computer that occupied the seat, say that 1500 minds, a middle (?) that please the disbelievers and the believers meet (???!!! .) Fifteen hundred custom humanities (!) Who had to hear more, eager to learn, hungry for wisdom. And so after Rettore intervened signor il Signor Cardinale Emminenza Sua Ravasi, Gianfranco. Where
put a cardinal, to remove a rector, of course. And that would not fully Cardinals habit, but dress less "flashy." I do not know - confiésolo - how would, what cloths, but venture that outside and beyond would cause a much more effective impression of the president. Sure.
What Ravasi said after that memorable event for universal equvocismo anthology? (The rector, I mean.) As the Rt Emm º º Ravasi not deterred by the president left. And if oxymorons are played, without thinking twice his throws to see who is stronger:
"God atheism." (Apostille the hack of Zenit: "... or what could be defined as the atheist spirituality ).
and engages in a reflection Ravasi (says the chronicle) on Cioran. I am not saying that is not a good sample button ad casum. All a show of how much you know and read what is His Eminence (Ravasi, EEOC) and how modernity ribetea purple of His Eminence, the moiré fringes of his crimson sash.
The effect on those who said in 1500 worship attendance, I would not know how to measure it. Nor did I know that I was not. But from my seat I wonder and ponder (I also know how to do that, and I'm not eminence) on the scene, their circusntancias, its surrounding and its value. And it manages to justify what was a Cardinal of the 2011 aD Cioran speaking before an audience convened at the University of Bologna and Gentiles an atrium.
and I quote "I recall the scene and the statement of St. Paul at the Areopagus, or not? Is that it comes into my head uncontrollably. Ravasi course was not booed or despised, missing more. It would, unlike St. Paul, applauded and admired. Why? For Cioran, is evident. If the customer likes and serve coffee coffee coffee, the best in fine china cup, with sugar candy, chocolate and mocha cake and glass of Benedictine, the customer leaves happy and eager to repeat more cafelitos Ravasi. His Eminence Gian Franco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, as pointed out by Zenit newsletter.
A Papal culture from a sprocket with the most select atheism, atheism university satisfied to have a Cardinal Ravasi, so in sync with the post-modern atheistic sensibility.
Returning to Cioran (the occurrence has been magnificent, masterful stage director) I do not understand how you can toggle that says the Lord to be salt and light with the discourse of Cioran and thought (often non-thought). Just Cioran. I understand that, given the choice, Cioran gives the excuse of being / not being, as appropriate.
But I am also convinced that the conference of the brilliant Cardinal Ravasi has not served to bring light to the soul, not just with the dark Cioran. But it will have left the taste of both Cioran as torn between darkness and the shadow of death are souls (sorry: minds, meant) chosen, well above the vulgar believers, the Catholic Common obtuse; So better recognized and kept at a trashy level Cioran believer. Ravasi dixit not, but it is understood - is obvious to a restless mind, questioning and interrogation, cuestionante and challenging - than what he means is that it is better Ravasi be and remain vitally Cioran style.
Anyway, if there is God at the end (¡¡??) give us a seat at all alike in Heaven (¿¿!!), cioranistas preference to the miserable and anxious about damn Catholics, Christians and other bad people ceryente. In general.
a pulpit for the shadows, as stated in the title. And a cardinal of the Holy Roman Church preaching smoke, indulging with bittersweet grajeas Cioran to post-modern paganism. Ps
By the way, you look at those (among others) are promoting the candidacy of Archbishop Ravasi for Milan: Gianfranco Ravasi Il Cardinale in pole position
+ T.
0 comments:
Post a Comment